Science’s inference problem: When data doesn’t mean what we think it does
Science’s inference problem: When data doesn’t mean what we think it does
- February 16, 2018
- Brian Skyrms, LPS, in The New York Times, Feb. 16, 2018
In their book TEN GREAT IDEAS ABOUT CHANCE … a historical and philosophical tour of major insights in the development of probability theory, the mathematician Persi Diaconis and the [UCI] philosopher Brian Skyrms emphasize another possible cause of the so-called replication crisis: the tendency, even among “working scientists,” to equate probability with frequency.
For the full story, please visit https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/16/books/review/science-inference-data.html.
Share on:
Related News Items
- UCI's Logic and Philosophy of Science Summer Diversity Program continues to champion underrepresented voices
- With George H.W. Bush hospitalized, the world wonders: Is it a broken heart?
- Top ranked
- This book shows us the value of a questioning mind (Book review)
- Science's inference problem: When data doesn't mean what we think it does
connect with us