Higher costs for bullet train worth it, California officials say
- November 2, 2011
- David Brownstone, economics professor, is quoted in the Los Angeles Times November 1, 2011
From the LA Times:
Rail officials say the project is needed to keep California competitive economically and accommodate the state's growing population, which is projected to increase by 20 million within the next 40 years. Without high-speed rail, the plan states, $171 billion will need to be spent in California on new highways and airport facilities. Future funding for the project remains a major question. Even before the new cost estimate, additional high-speed rail financial support faced a steep climb in Congress, which has been looking for ways to reduce the federal budget deficit. "I don't see where the financing is going to come from right now. The only way to do that is to create some kind of revenue source, like a tax. I don't see the political will for that today," said David Brownstone, an economics professor at UC Irvine, who has evaluated the project's earlier ridership and revenue projections.
For the full story, please visit http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2011/11/california-bullet-train.html.
Related News Items
- Language Science Ph.D. student presents work at the annual meeting for the Society for the Neurobiology of Language
- A remarkable shift in attitudes leaves U.S. even more divided on race
- The U.S.-China tariff failure of 2019
- What will Santa Ana do to keep low-income and Latino residents safe from toxic lead?
- Focus of Fed trading furore shifts to Powell's activities