Spirit’s collapse shows why bigger companies aren’t always a bad thing
Spirit’s collapse shows why bigger companies aren’t always a bad thing
- May 18, 2026
- Jan Brueckner, economics, offers insight on Daily Wire
-----
As UC Irvine economist Jan Brueckner put it to Slate: “A merger of those two carriers [Spirit-JetBlue] could have helped both of them and helped the traveling public, because what the merger would’ve done is create a larger low-cost carrier.” In his view, Spirit’s precarious financial footing argued in favor of greenlighting the deal, since doing so would have at least had the potential of saving the company.
For the full story, please visit Daily Wire.
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Related News Items
- Careet RightChicago program that set aside billions for development left poor areas behind, study says
- Careet RightZoning, rent control and the housing shortage
- Careet RightSpirit's collapse shows why bigger companies aren't always a bad thing
- Careet RightThe yellow jets go dark: What happens to Spirit's fleet?
- Careet RightWho killed Spirit Airlines?