The unintended consequences of L.A. County’s so-called “mansion tax”

The unintended consequences of L.A. County’s so-called “mansion tax”
- June 16, 2025
- Jack Liebersohn, economics, KNX News 97.1 FM, June 16, 2025 (Audio)
-----
Measure ULA, commonly known as the “mansion tax” went into effect in L.A. County over two years ago. … While its supporters promised it would raise tens of millions of dollars in revenues … to be put toward affordable housing, it hasn’t quite worked out that way. Economists at UC Irvine looked at the first two years of the mansion tax and found it had some significant unintended consequences … “After it took effect, people basically stopped selling certain types of property, in particular, commercial property, so the number of transactions fell by a lot. Overall, there’s something like a 50% decline in transaction volumes,” says Jack Liebersohn, UC Irvine assistant professor of economics. [Story starts at 21:15]
For the full story, please visit https://www.audacy.com/podcast/the-la-local-51f0f/episodes/lapd-sued-by-advocacy-group-for-targeted-violence-against-journalists-at-protests-37a16.
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Share on:
Related News Items
- UC Irvine-led study finds "Mansion Tax" may cost California in the long run
- UC Irvine economists examine the first two years of Measure ULA, known as the "mansion tax"
- The unintended consequences of L.A. County's so-called "mansion tax"
- Banking is getting easier, but is it riskier?
- Economics of Anteater life
connect with us: