The social nature of security and Haiti’s mobile money
The social nature of security and Haiti’s mobile money
- July 29, 2011
IMTFI Researcher Erin Taylor blogs about the social nature of security and Haiti's mobile money.
In a recent webinar hosted by USAID, Professor Bill Maurer from the IMTFI argued that phone sharing practices call into question how we judge mobile banking
security. Mobile banking is ostensibly secure because each account is linked to the
user’s SIM card, which has an internationally unique number. Since one mobile money account
equals one SIM card and one user, then it should be fairly straightforward to keep track of who
is sending money, how much, and to whom.
However, people’s relationships with mobile technology aren’t always as straightforward
as we might think. As Maurer points out, there are many places in the developing
world where one phone does not necessarily equal one owner. A family may share a
single mobile phone, or a village may have just one person who owns a phone and rents
it out to people when they want to use it. With mobile banking, this person may become
an informal money transfer agent, making a profit out of sending cash through her
own account. Alternatively, a person may have no phone, but own multiple SIM cards and potentially multiple mobile money accounts, thus complicating the ownership
formula. There are yet other cases where people own multiple phones and multiple
SIM cards in order to take advantage of differential pricing structures. Maurer argues
that the social nature of phone use needs to be taken into account when considering
mobile banking security.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Al-Bulushi to lead two-year study on Global South's role in shaping the future world order
- Where to start to explain Trump's win
- Even in California, progressives take a hit
- Election 2024: What the latest results show in Orange County's congressional races
- Rollback of criminal justice reforms front and center among California ballot measures
connect with us