'Duh' science: Why researchers spend so much time proving the obvious
'Duh' science: Why researchers spend so much time proving the obvious
- June 1, 2011
- Kyle Stanford, logic and philosophy of science professor, is quoted in the Los Angeles Times and 9 additional publications May 28, 2011
From the LA Times:
Accounts of "duh" research abound. There are studies showing that driving ability
worsens in people with early Alzheimer's disease, that women who get epidurals experience
less pain during childbirth than women who don't, that young men who are obese have
lower odds of getting married than thinner peers, that making exercise more fun might
improve fitness among teens.... Kyle Stanford, a professor of the philosophy of science
at UC Irvine, thinks the professionalization of science has led researchers - who
must win grants to pay their bills - to ask timid questions. Research that hews to
established theories is more likely to be funded, even if it contributes little to
knowledge.
For the full story, please visit http://www.latimes.com/health/la-sci-duh-20110529,0,725109.story
Also ran in:
Fox 2 Now
Fox 13
Morning Call
Q13 Fox
Radio 720 WGN
Spokesman-Review
WHO TV
WNEP
WREG
Share on:
Related News Items
- Democracy and its discontents: The attack on truth
- November's Fed meeting will move to avoid Election Day
- UCI sociologists earn American Sociological Association honors, leadership roles
- Helveticization, Comic CERNs, & Change: A Design Anthropologist on "Fontroversy"
- If interest rates go down, do home prices go down? Not quite.
connect with us