-----

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, Mexico City has risen to prominence as a global hub for remote work. Many remote workers with jobs, clients, and financial ties to the United States have relocated to Mexico City. The majority of these workers enjoy strong purchasing power and a good quality of life in Mexico City. Concurrently, the cost of living in the city has risen dramatically in neighborhoods popular with remote workers. Because of this, there has been pushback against the speed of gentrification in the city. The phrase “gringo go home” has become a popular means to express anger towards foreigners—especially Americans—moving to the city. Against this backdrop, how do migrant remote workers make sense of their placemaking?  This talk will examine remote workers’ aspirations, commitments, and experience of relocating to Mexico City. While remote workers are characterized by their shared mobility and flexible labor practices, the group is heterogeneous. Remote workers often distance themselves from identifiers such as “digital nomad” and “remote worker” because of the belief that—unlike the stereotypes—they are committed to building a meaningful home in Mexico City. Like upset residents, migrant remote workers also articulate parallel frustrations about the global housing crisis, lack of accountability for exploitative landlords, and rapid cultural and economic changes of Mexico City. Ultimately, this talk will explore placemaking in the context of gentrification, tourist-adjacent migration, and flexible labor practices.  

-----