Age discrimination and age stereotypes in job ads

Age discrimination and age stereotypes in job ads
- March 7, 2023
- David Neumark, UCI Distinguished Professor of economics, along with Ian Burn, Daniel Firoozi, and Daniel Ladd discuss their work in this piece for the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Economic Letter
-----
“One of the primary ways to reduce age discrimination in hiring is by identifying employers who hire a disproportionately low share of older workers who apply for jobs. However, employers may also discriminate by including age stereotypes in job ads that signal a preference for younger workers, thus discouraging older workers from applying for jobs in the first place. Because older workers often transition to new jobs before retiring, age discrimination in hiring can impede their efforts to continue working. This counteracts policies that encourage people to work longer, which will become increasingly important for maintaining the labor force as the population ages.
In this Economic Letter, we describe results from a field experiment showing that job-advertisement language related to ageist stereotypes—even when the language is not blatantly or specifically age-related—substantially reduces the number of applications from older workers. The reduction in hiring of older workers can be roughly as large as the direct effect from discrimination against older applicants.”
Continue reading: https://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2023/march/age-discrimination-and-age-stereotypes-in-job-ads/
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Careet RightRaising the minimum wage actually increases racial disparities
- Careet RightHeadquarters are leaving CA. What does this mean for our economy?
- Careet RightExperts answer: Are headquarters really fleeing California?
- Careet RightHigh-profile companies moving out of California
- Careet RightExempting tips from taxes could hurt employees, critics say

