The economic debate over the minimum wage, explained

The economic debate over the minimum wage, explained
- November 20, 2019
- David Neumark, economics, Vox, Nov. 20, 2019
-----
When modern minimum wage research began in the 1990s, there were two dominant approaches.
One approach, pioneered by [David] Card and [Alan] Krueger, compared border counties
in neighboring states, one of which increased the minimum wage and one of which didn’t.
The other, used by UC Irvine’s David Neumark and the Fed Board of Governors’ William
Wascher, tracked employment in full states over time, to see if employment fell in
the wake of a minimum wage increase. The two methodologies tended to get different
results: Card and Krueger, of course, found no employment effects, while Neumark and
Wascher tended to find substantial job loss following minimum wage increases.
For the full story, please visit https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/11/20/20952151/should-minimum-wage-be-raised.
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Careet RightRaising the minimum wage actually increases racial disparities
- Careet RightHeadquarters are leaving CA. What does this mean for our economy?
- Careet RightExperts answer: Are headquarters really fleeing California?
- Careet RightHigh-profile companies moving out of California
- Careet RightExempting tips from taxes could hurt employees, critics say

