The U.S. could be free of gerrymandering. Here’s how other countries do redistricting.

The U.S. could be free of gerrymandering. Here’s how other countries do redistricting.
- August 7, 2017
- Bernie Grofman, poli sci, via The Washington Post
-----
This year, on the first day of its term, the Supreme Court will consider the much-anticipated Gill v. Whitford. That case brings up the hot-button question of whether a state legislature may draw electoral districts that favor one party over another. Gerrymandering, as it’s called, is clearly prohibited if it’s done to dilute the votes of racial groups. But when it comes to partisan gerrymandering, the Supreme Court, while willing to hear some challenges, has so far been unwilling to declare such a plan to be an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. A decision on Gill affirming the lower court — or setting a new standard and remanding the case for further review by the lower court — has the potential to change that.
Before the Supreme Court weighs in, let’s look at how other countries redistrict. How does redistricting differ in the United States from elsewhere? Are there lessons for Americans in these varying experiences and procedures?
Read on, courtesy of The Washington Post...
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Careet RightReady for takeoff
- Careet RightYou might be surprised by how little impact a vice presidential pick has on voters
- Careet RightWisconsin taxpayers to pay half the cost of redistricting consultants hired by Supreme Court
- Careet RightNew Michigan House map remedies racial concerns that led to redraw, special master says
- Careet RightRedistricting experts submit $128K bill for review of Wisconsin legislative maps

