Anthropology a Science? Statement Deepens a Rift
Anthropology a Science? Statement Deepens a Rift
- December 15, 2010
- An op-ed by Tom Boellstorff, anthropology professor, is featured in the New York Times December 13, 2010
From the New York Times:
From my perspective as editor in chief of American Anthropologist, the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, I think that removing
"science" from its long-range statement doesn't deepen a rift so much as widen a misunderstanding.
I hope the association will reconsider because anthropology helps broaden the definition
of science itself. Science takes place not just in laboratories but in field sites;
it involves not just experiments but forms of nonreplicable observation, and not just
in anthropology but in sciences as diverse as zoology and astronomy.
For the full story, please visit http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/opinion/l14anthro.html.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Ready for takeoff
- Biden in Angola: U.S. Competes with China for Influence in Africa Amid Fight for Key Resources
- Tracking and enhancing students' college-to-career trajectories
- OC Leader Board: Ending Homelessness in Orange County: We Know What Works
- Disney settles suit over women's pay for $43 million
connect with us