Anthropology a Science? Statement Deepens a Rift

Anthropology a Science? Statement Deepens a Rift
- December 15, 2010
- An op-ed by Tom Boellstorff, anthropology professor, is featured in the New York Times December 13, 2010
-----
From the New York Times:
From my perspective as editor in chief of American Anthropologist, the flagship journal of the American Anthropological Association, I think that removing
"science" from its long-range statement doesn't deepen a rift so much as widen a misunderstanding.
I hope the association will reconsider because anthropology helps broaden the definition
of science itself. Science takes place not just in laboratories but in field sites;
it involves not just experiments but forms of nonreplicable observation, and not just
in anthropology but in sciences as diverse as zoology and astronomy.
For the full story, please visit http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/14/opinion/l14anthro.html.
-----
Would you like to get more involved with the social sciences? Email us at communications@socsci.uci.edu to connect.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Careet RightNotes from a future professor
- Careet RightCan Opportunity Zones ever meet their poverty-fighting promise?
- Careet RightFei Yuan named one of ten global China Times Young Scholar Fellows
- Careet Right'Wired for Words: The Neural Architecture of Language,' an excerpt
- Careet RightEveryone's looking for a partner who has these 3 traits, according to research

