Age discrimination in the job market may hurt women more
Age discrimination in the job market may hurt women more
- November 30, 2015
- Research by David Neumark, economics Chancellor’s Professor, is featured by FiveThirtyEight Economics Nov 30, 2015
From FiveThirtyEight:
“For decades, research on discrimination would just look at observational data — on
men and women, blacks and whites,” David Neumark, an economist at the University of
California at Irvine and an author of one of the new age-discrimination studies, said
in an interview. The study by Neumark and his co-authors is by far the largest known
résumé correspondence study. They sent out 40,000 résumés, randomizing the applicants’
names and year of graduation to signal their gender and age. Résumés with women’s
names were submitted for roughly two types of positions: administrative (secretaries
and assistants, office and file clerks, receptionists) and sales (retail workers and
cashiers). Résumés with men’s names also went out for jobs in retail sales, as well
as for janitorial and security guard positions. Across all occupations, Neumark and
his team found lower callback rates for women ages 64 to 66 (12 percent) than for
women ages 29 to 31 (19 percent). Older men, however, didn’t seem to have lower callback
rates than younger ones — with one exception. Janitorial jobs seemed to discriminate
against older men; Neumark speculated that a perceived reduction in physical stamina
could be one explanation.
For the full story, please visit http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/age-discrimination-in-the-job-market-may-hurt-women-more/.
Share on:
Related News Items
- Jon Coupal: ULA tax numbers expose economic ignorance
- Opinion: Black and Hispanic youths pay the biggest price for minimum wage hikes
- Fast food chains, workers are bracing for California's minimum wage increase: What to know
- Opinion: California's crazy 'fast food' minimum wage takes effect
- California fast food minimum wage going up
connect with us