How did you
set about achieving your life-long ambition to be the US Ambassador
to the United Nations? a group of students interviewing Jeanne
Jordan Kirkpatrick from her hometown in Duncan, Oklahoma, once asked.
I laughed, she recalls. It never even occurred to
me; it never crossed my mind. I was interested in being a political
science professorthat was my goal and in many ways its still
my goal.
Many people
would say that my most important professional achievement was serving
in the UN, she continues, but I wouldnt say that.
Many things stick outbeing at the UN was part of a much bigger
experience in my life.
Life has been and
continues to be an incredible journey for Ambassador Kirkpatrick. Ive
always had a lot of intereststoo many in some waysbecause
one of my interests would distract me from another, she explains.
Political Science, however, emerged as the primary interest to which
she dedicated her professional life.
After graduating
from Barnard College in 1948, Ambassador Kirkpatrick received a masters
in political science from Columbia University and embarked upon her
doctoral studies. Fourteen months into research on her dissertation,
tragedy interrupted the Ambassadors work. While in France on a
French government fellowship, she learned that her primary thesis advisor
had been killed in an accident in the Alps. In those days, a topic
was between a mentor and a student, she explains. When I
went back to Columbia, I was told that they didnt have anyone
who was interested in France at that time.
Although devastated
by this setback, Kirkpatrick picked up the pieces and dedicated herself
to a new era in her life. I entered into what I call my intensive
period of child bearing and child rearing, she says. There
was a time when my husband Kirk [also a political scientist and former
Director of the American Political Science Association] and I had three
boys under fivethey absorbed all of my attention and most of my
time for more than eight years. The births of my three sons were the
most important events in my life. Not much after that is my husband,
to whom I was married for a little over 40 years and who died a few
years ago.
The most important
events in my career are, I suppose, quite a bit harder to define. Completing
my PhD was very important. Ultimately, I started a new dissertation
entirely, retook my exams, and completed my doctorate, which then put
me in a position to win the job I wanted at Georgetown University in
1967. The Ambassador believes that the appointment at Georgetown
was crucial to her long-term career, because it put her on a serious
professional track. Also, since her sons were, by then, in school all
day, she felt free to concentrate on her professional interests.
You have to
remember that this was still a time when there were lots of prejudices
against women in the academic world, she explains. I had
good colleagues at Georgetown, I had good students, I liked being there
a lot, and I still do. I became progressively more and more engaged
in political science research and I developed new skills, including
new research skills.
Kirkpatricks
interest in the empirical approaches to political science, survey-based
research, and comparative politics laid the foundations for her next
three books: Leader and Vanguard in Mass Society: A Study of Peronist
Argentina, The Political Woman, and The New Presidential
Elite. I think that those books were significant political
and professional achievements, which established me as a serious political
scientist.
A lifelong Democrat,
Kirkpatrick also became involved in national politics including the
Democaratic Conventions of 1960, 1964, 1968, and 1972. During the Carter
Administration, however, she found herself increasingly disillusioned
with the partys stance, particularly on issues revolving around
foreign policy. During the summer of 1979, while spending time at her
house in the village of Les Beaux de Provence, in France, she wrote
an article titled Dictatorship and Double Standards, which
was later published in Commentary magazine.
At the time, Kirkpatrick
realized that she was undertaking unconventional analysis for someone
associated with liberal democratic politics. I was perplexed by
a lot of the positions my government was taking. I found some of those
policies undesirable and almost certain to fail. In the article, I took
the cases of Iran and Nicaragua as examples of foreign policy running
amuck that I thought was going to lead to very negative consequences
for the United States, she says. Were still coping
with one of those major failures todayIran.
An acquaintance
of Kirkpatricks read the article and handed a copy to Ronald Reagan,
who wrote Kirkpatrick and expressed his interest in discussing the article
with her. The future president and the future ambassador became acquainted
over the next six months. Kirkpatrick joined Reagans foreign policy
taskforce in the summer of 1980, at his request. After the election
in November of 1980, Reagan made a phone call to Kirkpatrick that altered
the course of her life.
In the same
breath he asked me to be his representative to the United Nations and
a member of his cabinet, she says. I said I wasnt
sure I could do the job, because Id never done anything like it
before. He said he was sure I could do it and he wanted me to. So, with
a lot of encouragement from my husband and from Ronald Reagan, I agreed
to give it my best try: that is how I came to be at the United Nations.
From 1981 to 1985
Dr. Kirkpatrick served as the first woman appointed by the United States
to serve as ambassador to the United Nations. I learned a lot
in my four-and-a-half years at the UN, she states. I learned
a great deal about the way the world works. I was also in the Cabinet
for those years and in the National Security Council. I learned a lot
about the way the US government works that I had never learned in political
science textbooks.
Kirkpatricks
best try clearly pleased President Reagan, who later referred to her
as a giant among the diplomats of the world. Still, Kirkpatrick
never doubted her desire to return to the university and resume her
academic career, which she has always felt was her true vocation. In
1985, after stepping down from her position at the UN, she returned
to Georgetown University. That same year, she officially became a Republican.
Since that time,
her life has continued to be rich and varied. She served as a member
of the Presidents Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 1985
to 1990 and as a member of the Defense Policy Review Board from 1985-1993.
From 1991 to 1992, Kirkpatrick chaired the Secretary of Defense Commission
on Fail Safe and Risk Reduction. She is a founding Co-Director of Empower
America and she holds the Thomas and Dorothy Leavey University Professorship
at Georgetown, where she continues to teach.
She has also received
numerous honors including the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the French
Prix Politique, the Gold Medal of Veterans of Foreign Wars, and the
Defender of Jerusalem Award. Georgetown University, Tel Aviv University,
St. Johns University, and Hebrew University have been among the
institutions that have awarded her honorary degrees.
In March of 2003,
President George W. Bush nominated Kirkpatrick to chair the US Delegation
to the 59th Human Rights Commission of the Economic and Social Council
of the United Nations. Reflecting upon the role the United Nations plays
in the world, Kirkpatrick says, I think the United Nations is
a place in which member states can develop important conversations and
important policies. The UN is important as an arena, but I do not think
its a major actor in world affairs, nor was it ever intended to
be. If you read the UN charter, for example, you will see immediately
that it says that the Secretary General is the principle administrator:
it doesnt say executive, it doesnt say leader, it says administrator.
Member states make the policies and the UN depends principally on decisions
of member states.
Rattling off a litany
of recent human rights abuses in Cuba, Chechnya, the Sudan and other
countries, the ambassador says she does not believe the Human Rights
Commission will make important progress until member states are willing
to condemn the human rights violations of other states. Thus far, she
does not see that willingness on the part of member states.
Nonetheless, her
resolve to address important political questions and issues facing the
world is unwavering and the lines between her professional life and
her personal life continue to be blurred. One of our sons once
said that he grew up in a political science subculture and, in a very
real sense, that was true, she explains. Jack Peltason [President
Emeritus, University of California and Chancellor Emeritus, UC Irvine]
is a good example of a very close personal friend and a professional
associatethere has never been any real distinction between the
two.
When Dr. Peltason
invited Ambassador Kirkpatrick to deliver the annual Peltason Lecture
on Democracy through the UC Irvine School of Social Sciences Center
for the Study of Democracy, she readily accepted. On Thursday, May 8,
2003, Kirkpatricks lecture, Human Rights and Democracy:
The Essential Connection, was attended by more than 200 students,
faculty, staff, friends of the school, and guests from the community.
This is my
third visit to UCI and I think its a beautiful campus, she
says. I admire the manner in which its developed. Ive
also been very favorably impressed with the social science program.
I think you have a rich program in the School of Social Sciences: each
time I come to campus it has developed since the previous time I was
here. I think its doing really well and I think students at the
School of Social Sciences are very lucky.
I met with
a group of young social scientists this morning and I gave them my very
best advice, she concludes. Follow your interests. The surest
way to have a successful and interesting life is to follow your interests.
I think if you do this consistently enough, good things happen.
return
to table of contents